|
| |
|
Ordination and Exclusion |
| For items on
"Living with the Authoritative
Interpretation" >> Cases and actions working through the 2006 GA action
allowing respect for conscience |
|
For a variety of items relating to issues of
gender and justice >> |
|
Appeal filed against approval of Scott Anderson for ordination
[3-1-20] Peter Smith of the
Louisville Courier-Journal reports that Caledonia
Presbyterian Church of Portage, Wis., has filed a challenge of
the vote by John Knox Presbytery to
ordain Scott Anderson, executive director of the Wisconsin
Council of Churches. Anderson is openly gay, living in a
long-term committed relationship.
Smith’s blog page invites comments. This was
the first one posted:
And then the Presbyterians wonder why
everyone is leaving the church. |
Scott Anderson approved for ordination by John Knox
Presbytery
[2-20-10]
By a vote of 81-25, the Presbytery of John Knox
approved Scott D. Anderson for ordination to the Ministry of
Word and Sacrament this morning.
Anderson served two Presbyterian congregations
as an ordained minister in the 1980s, but he set aside his
ordination in 1990, after he was "outed" by two church members
as a gay man. Since then he has served in ecumenical roles
in California and Wisconsin, and served as the only gay member
of the Theological Task Force on the Peace, Unity and Purity of
the Church.
In November, 2008, he put forward a "declaration
of conscience" against provision G-6.0106b of the Book of
Order, which effectively bans LGBT persons from consideration
for ordination in the Presbyterian Church. The Presbytery
accepted his declaration, and thereby approved him as a
candidate for ordination.
Today's action caps Anderson's years of
struggle to fulfill his sense of calling to ministry.
Scott writes in his note about today's Presbytery action:
It was a great experience, with fine
leadership on the part of the Presbytery, and a grace-filled
debate that proved once again that Presbyterians can
disagree without being disagreeable.
Blessings --
Scott Anderson
Added later:
A friend reports that after the meeting, which
was in executive session, and the vote, there was an
announcement asking people to sign up to begin an appeal.
More details on the approval of Scott Anderson
for ordination
[2-21-10]The John Knox
Presbytery, a regional governing body of the
Presbyterian Church (USA), voted at its February 20,
2010 meeting at Christ Presbyterian Church, Madison,
Wisconsin, to approve Mr. Scott Anderson, an openly
gay ministerial candidate, for ordination to the
Ministry of Word and Sacrament within the PC(USA).
The Presbytery approved Mr. Anderson's ordination by
a vote of 81 to 25.
Anderson's ordination bid included
an "Affirmation of Conscience" stating his
objections to the PC(USA)'s sexuality policy, which
is widely interpreted as barring openly practicing
gay and lesbian persons from ordained office.
Anderson's ordination is one of the first to be
approved in accordance with policy provisions that
allow ordaining bodies to consider candidates'
conscientious objections to particular articles of
church teaching.
Under the Presbyterian system,
when a candidate for ordination submits such an
objection, the governing body considering the
ordination must make an individual determination as
to the seriousness of the candidate's departure from
official teaching. If the governing body determines
that the candidate's objection does not undermine
essentials of church doctrine and governance, it may
proceed with the ordination in spite of the
disagreement. Such procedures were approved by the
denomination's national General Assembly in 2006,
and reaffirmed in 2008.
In the case of the vote to approve
Mr. Anderson, the Presbytery's decision does not
overturn denomination-wide policy, nor does it
establish any binding precedents for the future.
Instead it reflects local judgments that Mr.
Anderson's departures from official teaching were
not serious enough to overshadow his many other
gifts and bar him from the exercise of ordained
office.
"These policy provisions give
Presbyterians a way of affirming that the core faith
which binds us together is more significant than the
contemporary issues over which we sometimes
disagree," said Rev. Ken Meunier, the Executive
Presbytery of John Knox Presbytery. "Not everyone is
on the same page with this issue, but a great number
of people have been very impressed with Scott
Anderson's gifts for ministry. I believe the vote
reflects a desire of persons within the Presbytery
to make room for a variety of voices and opinions
within the church, and to exercise biblical
forbearance toward persons with whom they disagree."
Anderson's statement of conscience
affirmed the authority of Scripture, including "the
pattern that Scripture sets out for sexual
morality." He emphasized that "all Christians are
called to lives of holiness and faithfulness that
glorify God," but also argued that the Bible's
message is misapplied when it is used to exclude gay
people who are in covenanted, lifelong partnerships:
"I believe this misinterpretation of the biblical
witness is unfaithful to God's loving intentions for
humankind, and seriously undermines the church's
gospel witness to gay and lesbian persons."
Mr. Anderson will be ordained to
service as the Director of the Wisconsin Council of
Churches.
|
|
|
Church of Scotland
approves and installs openly gay minister Scott Rennie to an
Aberdeen church [12-28-09]
The Revs. John Mann and Lindsay Biddle have both
been serving Church of Scotland parishes in Glasgow. Part of
their Christmas letter reports on the decision by the Church of
Scotland to approve the call and installation of an openly gay
minister. Here is their report:
This is a historic year in the Church of
Scotland.
On Saturday, May 23, 2009, during its annual
meeting in Edinburgh, the General Assembly voted to approve the
induction (installation) of the Rev. Scott Rennie to Queen’s
Cross Parish Church in Aberdeen.
Scott is an openly-gay minister in “the Kirk,”
the Church of Scotland, and lives with his partner David Smith,
a religious education teacher in the Scottish school system.
Scott had applied to several churches seeking a new minister,
courageously letting them know about his sexual orientation and
family configuration.
The congregation of Queen’s Cross Parish
Church elected him to be their new minister on Sunday, November
20, 2008. Following complaints by some of its members, the
Aberdeen Presbytery held a special meeting in January 2009 and
voted to uphold the call. Twelve persons appealed the
presbytery’s decision, and in March a special commission of the
General Assembly forwarded the matter to the May meeting.
In the months leading up to the 2009 General
Assembly, the British media highlighted— and in a few instances,
contributed to — the brewing controversy in the Church of
Scotland. The many newspapers over here — each with an unabashed
and distinct political slant — are by and large supportive of
lesbian and gay people having the same rights and privileges as
straight people in their professional and personal lives. After
all, it has been four years since the United Kingdom parliament
enacted same-sex civil partnerships which are legally equivalent
to opposite-sex marriages, and “sexual orientation” is included
in anti-discrimination and hate-crime laws and in adoption and
other family policies. Where newspapers differ is in their
portrayal of the church: some treat it negatively as an
out-dated, out-of-touch institution and are downright
anti-clerical; while others are more positive, equating the
church to other important nation-wide organizations (like the
public transportation system) that need to be progressive and
accessible if they are going to meet the diverse needs of a
changing population.
As Chaplain of Affirmation Scotland, a group
formed three years ago to affirm the place of lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender Christians in the Church of Scotland,
Lindsay was put in the position of speaking to the media in the
run-up to the General Assembly. This was more by default than by
design: some members of Affirmation Scotland who are gay did not
wish to “come out” under these circumstances; and the group’s
able press spokesperson happened to be the former minister of
Queen’s Cross Parish Church and thus did not feel it was
appropriate for him to comment on the current situation.
Like every denomination when it finds itself
at the crossroad of justice, the 2009 General Assembly decided
the Kirk should spend the next two years studying the map. A
“Special Commission on Same-sex Relationships and the Ministry”
was appointed to consult presbyteries and sessions, prepare a
study, and report to the 2011 General Assembly. Meanwhile
congregations such as St. James’ in Pollok, where John serves,
are publicly declaring themselves “Affirming Congregations.” And
building on its early contribution to the special commission,
Affirmation Scotland has gone the extra mile and produced “The
Christian Faith and Sexuality Resource Pack” of personal
testimonies, heart-felt questions, and group discussion starters
to help presbyteries and churches become more affirming and,
here in Scotland, more relevant.
On the eve of American Independence Day, John
and Lindsay both participated in Scott Rennie’s induction
service at Queen’s Cross Parish Church. In the presence of a
fill congregation (and a few reporters) Scott was welcomed
individually by 80 ministers from the Presbytery of Aberdeen,
other presbyteries in the Church of Scotland, the Roman Catholic
Church, the Scottish Episcopal Church, and the PCUSA’s
Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area. In the front pew sat Scott’s
partner David, Scott’s daughter, and Scott’s former wife, Ruth.
Behind them were Scott’s relatives, David’s relatives, and
Ruth’s relatives, all of whom support Scott and his family and
his ministry.
May 2010 be a
historic year in the Presbyterian Church (USA) as the General
Assembly meeting in the Twin Cities courageously connects people
crying out for a church that affirms them with congregations
crying out for new life.
To read Scott Ronnie’s story in his own words
go to
www.OneKirk.org,
click on the Publications link, and download OneKirk Journal,
Spring 2009 issue.
Rev. Lindsay
Louise Biddle (PCUSA)
Rev. Dr. John W. Mann (Church of Scotland)
Glasgow
lindsaybiddle@hotmail.com
|
|
The PJC ruling on lgbt ordination, as seen from our “Mother
Church” in Scotland
[11-14-09] The Rev. Dr. John Mann, a
pastor of the Church of Scotland in Glasgow, formerly of the
PC(USA), has recommended
an article in The Times (United Kingdom) which
discusses the recent GA PJC
rulings on the cases of Paul Capetz and Lisa Larges, and how
they relate to the Church of Scotland.
The second paragraph of the article says:
A ruling last week by the High Court of
the Presbyterian Church of the United States (PCUSA),
cleared the way for a lesbian and a gay man, Lisa Larges and
Paul Capetz, to be appointed as ministers. Though the
verdict will have no direct bearing on ecclesiastical law in
Scotland, it will reverberate through Presbyteries from
Moray to Melrose.
Your WebWeaver especially likes the Scots
translation of “GA PJC” into “High Court.” Should the
revision of our Book of Order include that?
The Rev Lindsay Biddle, a minister with the
PC(USA) and spouse of John Mann, also serving in Glasgow, is
quoted at the end of the article as saying:
Scott Rennie [a divorced minister of the
Church of Scotland who lives with his partner, David, and
was recently called to as church in Aberdeen, a move which
aroused great opposition by conservatives], Paul Capetz and
Lisa Larges, and many others, are modern-day Martin Luthers.
The Christian church is going through a reformation with
homosexuality being the scapegoat issue or lightning rod.
While the outcomes certainly affect gay
and lesbian people, they reflect a Church that is changing
beyond some people’s comfort zone. For the rest of us, it’s
way past time.
Read the full article >> |
| GA PJC
issues technical rulings in two closely-watched ordination cases
Larges may be examined for ordination, Capetz'
restoration stands, high court says in rulings that fail to define
limits of 'scrupling'
by Jerry L. Van Marter,
Presbyterian
News Service
LOUISVILLE -- Nov. 11, 2009 -- The General
Assembly Permanent Judicial Commission (GAPJC) of the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) - the highest court in the church - has issued two
technical rulings that leave unresolved the extent to which
conscientious objection to the church's sexual conduct standards may
disqualify candidates for ordination.
The Nov. 2 rulings involve Lisa Larges, a lesbian
candidate for the ministry in San Francisco Presbytery, and the Rev.
Paul Capetz, a gay theology professor in the Presbytery of the Twin
Cities Area who set aside his ordination in 2000 and then sought
reinstatement in 2007.
The rulings effectively allow San Francisco
Presbytery to proceed to examine Larges for possible ordination and
the Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area to restore Capetz to ordained
ministry in the PC(USA).
Larges and Capetz both relied on an authoritative
interpretation of G-6.0108a of the Book of Order issued by the 2006
General Assembly. As part of its approval of the report from the
Theological Task Force on Peace, Unity and Purity of the church, the
interpretation allows candidates for ordination and installation as
church officers to declare a "scruple" or conscientious objection to
any provision of the church's Constitution.
It is then up to the ordaining body to determine
whether the scruple is a sufficient enough departure from the
essentials of the Reformed faith to be disqualifying.
Though it applies to any constitutional provision,
the declaring of scruples has so far only been utilized in objection
to G-6.0106b, which requires of church officers "fidelity within the
covenant of marriage or chastity in singleness."
Larges, who has been a candidate for the ministry
for more than 20 years, was certified by San Francisco Presbytery as
"ready for examination with a departure [scruple]" on Jan. 15, 2008
by a vote of 167-151.
Three minister members of the presbytery filed a
remedial complaint with the Synod of the Pacific PJC, alleging that
the presbytery's actions and those of its Committee on Preparation
for Ministry were improper. They sought to have the presbytery's
vote voided and Larges removed from the presbytery's roll of
candidates.
The synod PJC agreed that the presbytery had erred
by addressing the scruple prematurely - during the certification for
readiness rather than during a subsequent examination for ordination
- and voided the January 2008 vote. It refused to instruct the
presbytery to remove Larges from the roll of candidates.
The three San Francisco Presbytery complainants
appealed that ruling, telling the court that "the burning question
to which the church needs a clear answer" is whether scrupling
allows a presbytery to "waive" constitutional ordination standards.
The court didn't address that question, instead
affirming the synod PJC's ruling that the proper time for a
presbytery to consider a scruple and whether it is disqualifying is
during the examination for ordination, not during the CPM's
certification for readiness stage of the process.
Larges is scheduled to be examined for ordination
by San Francisco Presbytery on Nov. 10.
At that time, the court ruled, the presbytery is
required "to determine whether the Candidate has expressed an
interpretation of Scripture that represents a serious departure from
essentials of Reformed faith and polity, and if it determines that
she has, it must then decide whether the departure infringes on the
rights and views of others or obstructs the constitutional
governance of the church."
For the second time, the GAPJC ruled that the
Presbytery of Twin Cities Area did not err when it voted to restore
Capetz' ordination in January 2008. A professor at United
Theological Seminary in Minneapolis, Capetz had set aside his
ordination in 2000, four years after the PC(USA) added the
commonly-called "fidelity and chastity" provision to the Book of
Order. But when scrupling was reinstituted in 2006, he sought
restoration to ordained ministry, also declaring conscientious
objection to G-6.0106b.
In a related March 2009 decision that affirmed the
presbytery's decision, the GAPJC also ruled that the Synod of Lakes
and Prairies PJC must conduct a trial to determine if the presbytery
had in effect waived an ordination requirement.
That trial was held on May 12, 2009, and the synod
PJC ruled that the presbytery acted properly, adding that it "took
extraordinary care to make it clear that their decision applied only
to the current expression of [Capetz'] departure and was not making
policy or setting precedent...."
Capetz has repeatedly said he will not "take a vow
of celibacy." The GAPJC said that a remedial case (alleging faulty
process by governing bodies) is not the appropriate way to address
an ordained person's alleged misconduct.
"If there is any question about Capetz' conduct,
including whether he has led a life in obedience to Scripture and in
compliance with the historic confessional standards of the church,"
the court said, "he, like any other officer of the church, may be
held accountable for his conduct under the Rules of Discipline."
The
PJC decision on the case of Paul Capetz is posted on the PJC
website, in PDF format.
And
the
decision in the case of Lisa Larges in also posted.
|
ELCA votes to allow gay
pastors
[8-23-09]
Congratulations to our Lutheran sisters and brothers for their
church’s great step forward toward inclusion and justice!
One little thought: Any marriage or other
partnership that can thrive while carrying a label as an
“accountable lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationship,”
deserves all our respect. That’s the definition the ELCA study group
used in its report to the Assembly – for very good reasons, no
doubt. But it still seems like a lot for a couple people who love
each other to carry around with them.
Doug King
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here’s the opening of the report in the
Minneapolis Star Tribune:
In a historic change, noncelibate gays and
lesbians can now lead parishes of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in
America (ELCA).
On a 559-451 vote taken Friday in Minneapolis at
their biennial conference, delegates repealed the ELCA ban on gay
clergy unless they agree to remain celibate. It makes ELCA, with 4.8
million members nationwide and 830,000 in Minnesota, the largest
denomination in the country to welcome gays into the pulpits without
restriction. ...
The new rules, which likely will go into effect in
November, allow the installation of gay pastors but let individual
congregations and synods make their own decisions about whether to
choose a gay pastor.
The rest of the story >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Reuters also provides a good report on the vote, including a
look at the changing society and attitudes that form the backdrop of
this vote.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And then ... a warning in a wind-storm?
But more than one unhappy Lutheran took note of
the wind storm – possibly a tornado – that on Wednesday afternoon
roared over the Minneapolis Convention Center and did some damage to
the Lutheran church right next door, before the assembly actually
got to the vote on this action.
Peter Smith of the Louisville Courier Journal
reports on the Rev. John Piper, a Baptist Minnesota pastor, who
wrote:
Jesus Christ controls the wind, including all
tornados. ... The tornado in Minneapolis was a gentle but firm
warning to the ELCA and all of us: Turn from the approval of
sin. Turn from the promotion of behaviors that lead to
destruction. Reaffirm the great Lutheran heritage of allegiance
to the truth and authority of Scripture. Turn back from
distorting the grace of God into sensuality. Rejoice in the
pardon of the cross of Christ and its power to transform left
and right wing sinners.
See Smith’s blog >>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More Light
Presbyterians has issued this statement:
Lutheran Churchwide Assembly votes to support
clergy in same-sex relationships
The National Board & Staff of More Light
Presbyterians rejoice with our sisters and brothers within Lutherans
Concerned North America as the Evangelical Lutheran Church of
America (ELCA) Churchwide Assembly voted today in Minneapolis to
support clergy in same-sex relationships.
"We give thanks to God for this affirmation of
clergy in same-sex relationships within the Evangelical Lutheran
Church of America. This vote inspires me to continue the dialogue
within the Presbyterian Church (USA)," said Rev. Janet Edwards,
Co-Moderator, More Light Presbyterians.
Lutherans Concerned North America, a sister
organization to More Light Presbyterians, is in a collaborative
partnership called Good Soil: Where Justice Takes Root that works
for the full participation for persons of all sexual orientations
and gender identities within the ELCA.
Michael Adee, Executive Director & Field
Organizer, MLP said, "As More Light Presbyterians, we are grateful
for the moral and spiritual leadership demonstrated by the
Churchwide Assembly of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America in
today's historic vote. Surely this will inspire and encourage the
Presbyterian Church (USA) to do the same by recognizing the faith,
integrity and call to ministry of its own LGBT daughters and sons."
The report from Reuters' news service follows this
good news from the ELCA's Churchwide Assembly. For more news and
reflections on this vote and other LGBT initiatives, you can go to
www.lcna.org and
www.goodsoil.org.
"The Evangelical
Lutheran Church's decision and witness today is clearly part of
living out the extravagant welcome and God's love for all persons,
regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity or any other human
difference. This is a day to rejoice and give thanks," said Vikki
Dearing, Co-Moderator, MLP.
with hope and grace,
Michael
Michael J. Adee, M.Div.,
Ph.D., Executive Director & Field Organizer,
More Light Presbyterians
|
| God
vs. Gay – thoughts from Lisa Larges
Right after the
Permanent Judicial Commission of the
Synod of the Pacific ruled (apparently) against her proceeding
with her candidacy for ordination, Lisa Larges wrote a strong,
passionate and insightful essay on the church’s continuing rejection
of LGBT people. She writes for a gay audience in The Advocate,
and urges them to pay attention to religion and churches, even if
they find little to attract or help them there.
She begins:
Like a
colonoscopy or head lice, the word Christian is a conversation
killer among LGBTs. So I will admit up front that whatever it is
you’re thinking right now about Christians – hypocritical,
antigay, anti-sex, anti-women, anti-choice – you’ve got plenty
of evidence to back you up. Let’s also say, while we’re still
here in the first paragraph, that whatever the church or its
representatives did to you – whatever abuse, whatever violation
of trust, whatever was said to make you believe that you were
not a child of God in your whole beautiful queer self, whatever
the silence in which you did not hear how infinitely and
immeasurably God loves you -- whatever drove you out of the
church is simply inexcusable. But unless our community changes
the “God vs. Gays” paradigm, we will never achieve full
equality. Nor will it be possible for so many of us to live out
our truths. My truth, strange as it may be, is a calling to
ministry. It’s also the truth of a lot of fierce and beautiful
gay people I know, whose stories aren’t told often enough.
And she closes:
My wish – OK,
since I’ve come out this far, I’ll say “my prayer” – is that all
who seek spiritual strength in the Christian church will find
it, no matter their sexual orientation or gender identity. That
all may freely worship. That all may freely serve. That is my
prayer.
So, amen anyway.
Now see what’s in between >>
Presbyterian Outlook reports on the Synod PJC decision >>
Outlook also
reports
Lisa Larges' comments in response >> |
Mixed decision
handed down against Lisa Larges in her long pursuit of ordination
[3-25-09]News release
from That All May Freely Serve
San Francisco, March 25, 2009…
A ruling related to allegations that a regional
church body acted improperly in considering the statement of
conscience of Lisa Larges, an openly lesbian candidate for ministry
in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), was announced earlier today by
a regional commission of the church. In its
eight page ruling, the commission rejected the procedural
process used by the Presbytery of San Francisco to certify its
applicants for ministry for candidacy for ordination in the Church.
In ruling on the procedural issue, the church commission effectively
set aside the certification of Lisa Larges. Certification would have
allowed Larges to be examined for ordination.
Her statement in reaction to the ruling:
This decision makes it abundantly clear that
the Presbyterian church must remove the current prohibitory
language that denies ordination to openly LGBT people and adopt
a new policy. The amendment now being voted on across the
country properly aligns our understanding of ministry with the
mandates of first following Jesus. It gives Presbyteries clear
authority to recognize the gifts and call of candidates for
ministry they believe are fully qualified, no matter their
sexual orientation or gender identity. Candidates, presbyteries
and committees who have sought to act faithfully under the
current constitution have only been rewarded with challenges and
allegations. This decision fosters on-going confusion and
demonstrates clearly just how unworkable the current policy is
for those seeking a fair hearing.
More than anything, I’m mindful of all the
other lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) candidates
for ministry who only want to serve our church. The way forward
for them need not be this complicated. This ruling, though
technical in nature and limited in scope, nonetheless has deeply
personal and painful repercussions for my life and in the lives
of other LGBT people earnestly seeking to serve the church. For
me, this ruling has already delayed my candidacy for ministry
for over one year. I believe the best possible outcome of this
decision would be that it will clarify the ordination process
for other LGBT persons whose gifts, calls, faith and leadership
the church cannot afford to lose. Procedural decisions like
this, while important, pale in comparison to the greater urgency
of removing all barriers to ordination for those who are called
to freely serve the church. Right now, our Presbyteries have the
best opportunity yet to vote for fairness, inclusion and
welcome.
In June, the national church’s policy setting
group, the General Assembly, voted to remove restrictive language
prohibiting gays and lesbian ordination from the church
Constitution. The 173 Presbyteries are currently voting on this
change, which needs a simple majority for ratification. The ruling
in Larges’ case could have an impact on the remaining votes. In
2002, Larges began work with the organization That All May Freely
Serve, a group that advocates for a church that honors diversity and
welcomes lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons as full
members eligible for ordination. She now serves as the Minister
Coordinator of the group.
About Lisa Larges:
Lisa has sought ordination to Minister of Word and
Sacrament in the Presbyterian Church for more than 20 years. A
lifelong Presbyterian, Lisa became a candidate for ministry in the
Twin Cities Presbytery in 1986. Because she felt as a matter of
conscience that she could not serve the church without being open
and honest about her identity as a lesbian, Lisa came out to the
Twin Cities committee overseeing candidates in 1991. The Twin Cities
Presbytery affirmed her call to ministry as an open lesbian, and
that affirmation was overturned in 1992 by a ruling from the highest
judicial court in the Presbyterian Church.
In a groundbreaking decision the Presbytery of San
Francisco approved Lisa to move forward in the ordination process
after she submitted a statement of conscience calling the ban on gay
and lesbian ministers “a mar upon the Church and a stumbling block
to its mission.”
About
That All May Freely Serve:
Called by the life and teachings of Jesus,
compelled by faith, and charged by conscience, That All May Freely
Serve (TAMFS) advocates for a church that honors diversity and
welcomes lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons as full
members, which includes eligibility for ordination to the offices of
Elder, Deacon, and Minister of Word and Sacrament.
TAMFS formed in response to a 1992 decision by the
highest judicial body of the Presbyterian Church (USA) which set
aside the pastoral call of the Rev. Dr. Jane Adams Spahr to the
Downtown United Presbyterian Church in Rochester, NY, simply because
she was honest and open about her lesbian identity. TAMFS attempts
the work of “personning the issue,” through telling the stories of
LGBT Presbyterians and building relationships at a local grassroots
level.
|
From More Light
Presbyterians ... Answering God's Call
to Serve:
218th GA Ordination Overture 08-B
[9-9-08, revised 9-13-08]
The National Board of Directors of More Light
Presbyterians unanimously and joyfully affirmed its support of the
218th General Assembly's Ordination Overture 08-B and the following
statement on September 6, 2008 during its recent board meeting in
Santa Fe, NM.
Ordination Overture 08-B is being considered by
the presbyteries for ratification over the next nine months. A
simple majority vote is needed for ratification.
We rejoice in how God's Spirit moved the General
Assembly in San Jose this summer. As we enter into this period of
discernment, dialogue and decision we pray that the Spirit will be
in every conversation, every presbytery discussion, every vote and
with our entire Church.
Answering God’s Call to Serve!
218th General Assembly
Ordination Overture 08-B
* Obedient to Jesus
* Led by Scripture
* Instructed by the Confessions
Proposed new text for G-6.0106b:
"Those who are called to ordained service in the church,
by their assent to the constitutional questions for
ordination
and installation (W-4.4003), pledge themselves to live lives
obedient to Jesus Christ the Head of the Church,
striving to follow where he leads
through the witness of the Scriptures,
and to understand the Scriptures
through the instruction of the Confessions.
In so doing, they declare their fidelity to the
standards of the Church.
Each governing body charged with examination
for ordination and/or installation (G-14.0240 and G-14.0450)
establishes the candidate's
sincere efforts to adhere to these standards."
This overture honors and restores our traditional
Reformed understandings of ordination. It places emphasis where it
always has been in our Church, and where it should be today – on the
vows taken by all officers. These offices of service and ministry
include deacon, elder and Minister of the Word and Sacrament. Those
vows are to live a life exemplified by Jesus and in fidelity to the
Scriptures and Confessions of the Church.
This overture lifts up standards for ordination as
the cornerstone for service. This honors our roots while
transcending old divisions. It enables us to move forward together
in Christian service. It unites us in a single truth, which we have
always believed – to heed God’s call to service wherever it comes,
whenever it comes, and to whomever it comes.
For thirty years we have suffered from the divisions caused by the
narrow and unprecedented discrimination against lesbian,
gay, bisexual and transgender Presbyterians. The Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) will be healed when the call to office is returned
to the governing and electing bodies who know the potential
officer’s character and gifts for office. The
Presbyterian Church (USA)) will be healed when the call to serve is
returned to the governing and electing bodies who know the potential
officer’s character and gifts for that office.
We urge all Presbyterians to prayerfully consider
and to vote YES on Overture 08-B! We invite all of you to join this
effort to ratify Ordination Overture 08-B.
For more information, educational resources and
organizing opportunities, stay tuned at
www.mlp.org or call the National MLP Field Office at (505)
820-7082. Together We are Building a Church for All God's People!
with hope and grace,
Michael
PS - There is a place for everyone in this
"Answering God's Call to Serve" Campaign. Stand by for a FAQ on
08-B, educational resources and local organizing tips.
Michael J. Adee, M.Div., Ph.D., Executive Director
& Field Organizer
More Light Presbyterians
369 Montezuma Avenue # 447
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 USA
(505) 820-7082
michaeladee@aol.com
www.mlp.org |
| Witherspoon co-moderator affirms ordination for a
fully inclusive church {6-24-08]
On Saturday morning (long, long ago!), June 21, the
Witherspoon Society presented a time of orientation for
commissioners and others – offering some practical hints for working
effectively in the Assembly, and some perspectives on a few of the
issues that, from our justice-oriented focus, seem most important.
One of those issues, of course, is the question of
whether our church will truly welcome lgbt members into its life and
leadership. Witherspoon Co-Moderator Jake Young presented this
perspective:
Read his
statement >> |
|
Ray Bagnuolo
offers careful thinking – and strong advocacy – for inclusive
ordination
[6-14-08]
The Rev. Ray Bagnuolo, who describes himself as a gay
Presbyterian minister of Word and Sacrament, is currently serving as
interim pastor of Palisades (NY) Presbyterian Church.
Over the past few months he has posted six carefully considered and
documented papers dealing with the ongoing debate about ordination
of lgbt Presbyterians.
Details and links to each of the papers >> |
|
Overtures Dealing with Ordination
of Gay and Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Persons
by Gene TeSelle, Witherspoon Issues Analyst
[5-24-08]
The “ordination question” is an old one in
the Presbyterian Church, going back to the 1970s and the
“definitive guidance” issued by the 1978 General Assembly
which cast doubt on the ordination of persons with same-sex
orientation. Several overtures coming to this GA include
language rescinding that definitive guidance.
Debate
was intensified with the adoption of G-6.0106b (“Amendment
B”) in 1996-97, with its restrictive language. Several
attempts have been made to delete or amend this article,
losing narrowly in the presbyteries.
As the church tried to deal with serious
differences, the 2001 General Assembly appointed the
Theological Task Force (TTF) on the Peace, Unity, and Purity
of the Church (PUP), and its key recommendations were
adopted by the 2006 General Assembly, including a new
Authoritative Interpretation (AI) that affirmed paragraph
G-6.0108 in the Form of Government. This defends freedom of
conscience in all matters that are not “essentials” of
faith, polity, or practice.
Tensions were increased earlier this year
when the Permanent Judicial Commission (PJC) of the General
Assembly ruled that one restrictive provision of G-6.0106b
(“fidelity and chastity,” not all the other practices that
the confessions call sin) is, in effect, an “essential” that
must be upheld. This went contrary to the letter and spirit
of the 2006 AI.
Some of the overtures coming to this GA are
responses to these most recent developments, the 2006 AI and
the recent PJC decision. Others deal with long-term
questions about the church’s attitude toward same-sex
relationships and specifically the restrictions in
G-6.0106b.
Overtures related to G-6.0108 and the “PUP
AI”
In the wake of the PJC decision making
one sentence in G-6.0106b an absolute requirement for
ordination, an overture from the Presbytery of John Knox
calls for a new AI declaring that G-6.0108 applies
equally
to all ordination standards. This overture has been
advocated by Mark Achtemeier, a conservative member of
the Theological Task Force. (Some angry conservatives,
apparently viewing him as a traitor, are calling this
the “Achtemeier overture.”) Adopting this AI is
certainly the least that this Assembly can do to get the
church back on the course set by the 2006 AI.
Many presbyteries are bringing overtures
that reinforce the 2006 AI and, building on the
experience of sessions and presbyteries, seek its more
effective implementation. The overtures
(a) commend those presbyteries and
sessions that have incorporated theological reflection
and prayerful discernment into their examination
procedures;
(b) direct the Stated Clerk to collect
models of such procedures and make them available to the
whole church; and
(c) remind governing bodies to take
theological reflection and discernment seriously as they
carry out their constitutional responsibilities.
These overtures come from Scioto Valley,
Cayuga-Syracuse, Giddings-Lovejoy, Redwoods, Maumee
Valley, Middle Tennessee, Cascades, Western Reserve,
Albany, National Capital, and Heartland.
But not all presbyteries favor the 2006
AI. Their overtures follow several different strategies:
(1) rescind the AI (South Louisiana, St.
Andrew, Sacramento, Huntingdon, and Central Washington);
(2) amend the AI with additional wording
to make it more restrictive (St. Andrew, Pittsburgh);
(3) offer substitute wording that is more
restrictive (St. Andrew, Huntingdon, Pittsburgh);
(4) make all the “shalls” in the Form of
Government essential for ordination (Cherokee, Los
Ranchos, Charleston-Atlantic).
Overtures related to G-6.0106b
A number of overtures call for an
amendment to the Form of Government,
deleting
G-6.0106b (“Amendment B”) and issuing a new AI.
These come from Hudson River, National Capital,
Baltimore, Albany, New York City, Redwoods, and
Genesee Valley.
Various people have commented that
this approach, while it would remove a paragraph
that has caused much hurt and division in the
church, is simply negative, trying to remove it from
the face of the earth.
They favor a “let’s make it better”
approach, and there are several overtures that offer
wording to replace
the unjust and prejudicial language in G-6.0106b. No
fewer than three different choices are being
offered. One formulation comes from Boston; another
from Cincinnati and Santa Fe; a third from New Hope.
From the conservative side, an
overture from St. Andrew would amend this paragraph
with stricter wording. And a proposed AI from
Huntingdon would declare it an essential of Reformed
faith and polity.
Overtures dealing with marriage
The definition of marriage in the
Directory for Worship has led to several
controversies in past General Assemblies.
Overtures proposing a broader definition of
marriage as a “covenant between two people” have
been sent by Baltimore and Hudson River.
An overture from New Brunswick
and Denver would affirm equal civil protections
for same-sex couples and call for a special
committee that would study marriage laws and
their effects and examine the unique needs in
pastoral care for same-sex couples.
Overtures dealing with the Book
of Confessions
In the Heidelberg Catechism,
the answer to Q. 87 includes “homosexual
perversion” as one of the marks of those who
cannot inherit the kingdom of God (C-4.087).
People who know the text of the catechism
from other Reformed churches, or have looked
up the original German, will know that this
language is not there. It was added in the
1960s, when the entire Book of Confessions
was adopted in order to include more of the
rich tradition of the Reformed churches. Its
wording, furthermore, seems to make sexual
orientation, not behavior alone, into a sin.
A number of overtures call
for a more authentic wording, with three
different approaches.
Some ask, in a general way,
that the translation of the Catechism be
replaced with a more faithful one (Northern
Kansas, Pittsburgh, New York City, Chicago).
Two (from Boston and
Winnebago) would adopt the translation now
used by the Christian Reformed Church.
[Author’s note: this translation, while
accurate, loses much of the colloquial force
of the original German and thus takes on a
more dogmatic tone.]
One, from Newark, offers
specific changes of wording not only for
this but for three other passages in the
Heidelberg Catechism.
For more on the Heidelberg Catechism >>
|
Where we stand:
The Witherspoon
Society has championed
inclusiveness in the church for
the last 35 years. It opposed
the 1978 definitive guidance and
the 1996 “Amendment B.” It has
sought removal or alteration of
G-6.0106b. It favored the
adoption of the 2006 AI, while
regarding it as only a partial
measure, and it deplores the PJC
decision that goes against the
letter and the spirit of that
AI. We urge the Assembly to
adopt another AI that reaffirms
the 2006 AI, and to send to the
presbyteries an amendment that
removes the prejudicial language
of G-6.0106b. We also commend
the overtures regarding marriage
and the Heidelberg Catechism. |
|
Wisdom from the Scots
Confession
in considering the need for change of G-6.0106b
[3-21-08]
This note came to us through an
e-list of More Light Presbyterians. The author, Witherspoon
member Charles Forbes, has kindly given us permission to post it
here.
Greetings,
Those who know me would know
that perusing the Book of Confessions is not a likely pastime
for me, but that is what I found myself doing the other day, for
very arcane reasons. I happened upon a Chapter of the Scots
Confession that speaks, I think, rather boldly to G-6.0106b. I
don't pass this reference along because I believe that it will
change the polity climate of the PCUSA in the near term. But it
does give comfort to those whose consciences are torn between
justice and their ordination vows, which call not only for
conformity to church polity, but to be instructed by its
Confessions.
Chapter XVIII of the Scots
Confession is entitled "The Notes by Which the True Kirk Shall
Be Determined From the False, and Who Shall Be Judge of
Doctrine."
The chapter concludes:
When controversy arises
about the right understanding of any passage or sentence of
Scripture, or for the reformation of any abuse within the
Kirk of God, we ought not so much to ask what men have said
or done before us, as what the Holy Ghost uniformly speaks
within the body of the Scriptures and what Christ Jesus
himself did and commanded. For it is agreed by all that the
Spirit of God, who is the Spirit of unity, cannot contradict
himself. So if the interpretation or opinion of any
theologian, Kirk, or council, is contrary to the plain Word
of God written in any other passage of the Scripture, it is
most certain that this is not the true understanding and
meaning of the Holy Ghost, although councils, realms, and
nations have approved and received it. We dare not receive
or admit any interpretation which is contrary to any
principal point of our faith, or to any other plain text of
Scripture, or to the rule of love.
Fairly paraphrased, no
interpretation or opinion of any council (read, GA) even though
councils, realms, and nations have approved and received it
(e.g. G-6.0106b) it is not the true understanding of the Holy
Ghost if it is contrary to ... the rule of love.
I love the elevation of "the
rule of love" to the same status as "any plain text of
Scripture"!
Going straight to the point,
surely G-6.0106b is an "abuse within the Kirk of God" is it not?
"It's in the Book!"
Charles Forbes
Baltimore
The Rev.
Hal Porter, of Cincinnati, then sent this comment:
It is always good to receive
Charles Forbes “musings.” His comments should remind us of the
last major statement of our church in the early 1980’s regarding
“Presbyterian Understanding and Use of Holy Scripture.” The
document is still available on line or in pamphlet form from OGA.
The relevant passage is as follows:
5. The Rule of Love: The
fundamental expression of God’s will is the two-fold
commandment to love God and neighbor, and all
interpretations are to be judged by the question whether
they offer and support the love given and commanded by God.
When interpretations do no meet this criterion, it must be
asked whether the text has been used correctly in the light
of the whole Scripture and its subject.
Any interpretation of
Scripture is wrong which separates or sets in opposition
love for God and love for fellow human being, including both
love expressed in individual relations and in human
community (social action). No interpretation of Scripture is
correct which leads to or supports contempt for any
individual or group of persons either within or outside of
the church. Such results from the interpretation of
Scripture plainly indicate that the rule of love has not
been honored. This rule reminds us forcefully that as the
rule of faith and life, Scripture is to be interpreted not
just to discover what we are to think or what benefits we
receive from God in Christ, but to discover how we are to
live.
The passage from the Scots
Confession Charles muses on is used to underline the above
passage in “Presbyterian Understanding and Use of Holy
Scripture.” Certainly we have failed this Rule of Love as we
interpreted the scriptures and Charles is right to apply it to
the contemptible G-6.0106b. Thanks, Charles.
Hal Porter
|
|
GA Permanent Judicial Commission
rules out conscientious objection to “fidelity and chastity”
requirement
PJC says only
a constitutional amendment will change things
[2-16-08]
The General Assembly Permanent
Judicial Commission (GAPJC) has overthrown the authoritative
interpretation that the General Assembly approved in 2006, which
would have allowed candidates for ordination to declare a
“scruple” against a particular requirement for ordination, on
the grounds that they could not in conscience adhere to it.
Specifically this means that any
candidate for ordination as a minister or elder must obey the
requirement of “fidelity in marriage or chastity in singleness,”
which was added to the Book of Order as provision
G-6.0106b.
The ruling of the GA PJC,
issued on February 11, 2008, actually deals with three cases,
all of which touch on the issue of sexuality and ordination.
The action of the 2006 General
Assembly left it up to the discernment of the ordaining body
(the session for elders, the presbytery for ministers) as to
whether the ordination requirement must be regarded as
“essential,” and therefore an absolute requirement, or might be
seen as not essential, and therefore might be set aside in the
case of a particular individual.
This PJC ruling describes the
“fidelity and chastity” provision as “a mandatory standard that
cannot be waived.” Further, it makes clear that while candidates
may be permitted to “depart” from ordination standards related
to belief, they cannot be allowed the same freedom of conscience
with regard to behavior.
And it upheld language from a
prior Synod of the Trinity PJC ruling which made a distinction
between allowing departures from the church’s standards related
to belief – but not departures related to behavior.
Presbyterians committed to a
fully open and inclusive church, including its practices of
ordination, have differed over the past few years in their
strategies for dealing with the essentially exclusionary demands
for “fidelity and chastity.” Some have sought a gradual approach
to changing practice and the application of ordination standards
through action in presbyteries, which others have believes that
no real change would happen until the “fidelity and chastity”
requirement in G-6.0106b of the Book of Order is totally
removed.
The PJC seems to side with the
latter approach, especially when it declares: “the fidelity and
chastity standard may only be changed by a constitutional
amendment. Until that occurs, individual candidates, officers,
examining and governing bodies must adhere to it.”
It seems likely that this
action will reverse the moves toward a more inclusive church
recently taken by two presbyteries: On January 15, San Francisco
presbytery voted 167 to 151 to approve as “ready for
examination”
Lisa Larges, a lesbian who works for the advocacy group,
That All May Freely Serve. And on January 26, the
Presbytery of the Twin Cities Area voted 196 to 79 to restore
the ordination of Paul Capetz, a gay seminary professor who
voluntarily set aside his ordination in 2000 in protest over the
PC(USA)’s ordination standards.
More reports and comments >>
We welcome your comments and additions!
Just send a note. |
| The Soul-Sucking,
Imagination-Challenged, Trust-Bereft Thing We Call The Examination of
Candidates for Ordination by
Jan Edmiston
[10-6-07]
So . . . is this how it’s going to be?
A presumably pre-assigned elder or clergy member of the Presbytery will
stand up, identify himself or herself, and then ask a candidate for
ordination, "Since we as a Presbytery haven’t heard your answer, can you
tell us if you are now and do you plan in the future to be in compliance
with the requirement to live either in fidelity within the covenant of
marriage between a man and a woman or chastity in singleness?"
Even after the chairperson of the Committee on Ministry has already
declared before God and the Presbytery that candidates are asked a rigorous
litany of questions – including that one – this question continues to be
asked, making what is supposed to be an engaging and helpful examination
into an eye-rolling, humiliating, yes – soul sucking – exercise in power and
self-righteousness.
Was this the intention of the Report on Peace, Unity, and Purity?
Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary Professor Cynthia Rigby (who
reminded us that "Presbyterian" is still part of the name of that
institution) asked us at the September Presbytery meeting to consider
whether we care more about being imaginative or being right. Is it worse to
be boring or to be wrong? Clearly, the votes have been cast.
Will it be like this forever? Could we, in solidarity with the
Peace, Unity, and Purity Committee, break bread together, perhaps, and talk
like sisters and brothers in Christ? Or is this simply real live
verification that we can further the peace or the unity
or the purity of the church – but we can’t further all three?
These episodes are demeaning and beneath us as disciples of Jesus Christ.
I am, frankly, without the right words to express my dismay.
But I’d like to offer a challenge:
- If you feel moved to defend standards of ordination by asking this
question, please also agree to meet with someone with whom you disagree
about this issue prior to the examination for prayer and conversation.
- Meet with the candidate prior to the examination for prayer and
conversation.
- Meet with someone from the Committee on Ministry and/or Committee on
Preparation for Ministry for prayer and conversation.
And as we listen to each other, we need to remember that listening is not
simply waiting for our turn to talk. At the risk of sounding self-righteous
myself, I humbly request that we stop lifting up "sexual standards" as the
primary standard for ordination. It only serves to further divide the
Body of Christ, and I tremble at the thought of how Jesus would respond to
this.
Ordination is not about any one issue. It’s about the full package of
God’s calling, serious preparation, and community confirmation. And the more
that people insist on harping on a single matter, the less seriously they
will be taken. In the spirit of peace, unity, and purity I want to take all
my colleagues in ministry seriously.
The author: Jan Edmiston is
the pastor of Fairlington Presbyterian Church in Alexandria, Virginia
and a blogger at
A Church for Starving Artists .
First published in the National Capital Monthly, the
newsletter of the National Capital Presbytery, Washington, DC.
|
| Finding a
new place to answer call Gay graduate of Austin Seminary
leaves denomination to pursue ministry.
[3-13-07]
A message from Michael Adee, National Field Organizer
of More Light Presbyterians
Karen Thompson said she is sad, but not bitter that the
Presbyterian Church is still struggling with sexuality issues in ordaining
ministers. God led her to the seminary, she says, though now she'll be
answering his call to serve elsewhere
Please join us in prayers of blessing for Karen Thompson,
Austin Theological Seminary graduate, who is leaving the Presbyterian Church
(USA) to follow God's call to serve as a pastor in another denomination, the
Metropolitan Community Church.
Central Presbyterian Church, Austin, Texas held a special
service of Hope and Reconciliation yesterday as they said farewell to Karen
Thompson who had been under their care throughout her theological studies at
Austin Theological Seminary.
Faith
Presbyterian Church, Austin, a More Light Church where Karen served as a
seminary intern honored her with a stole to be shared with
The Shower of Stoles Project.
In writing about Karen Thompson's following her call from
God to serve in ministry, Flynn describes this decision as: "Finding a new
place to answer call," with the second statement - "Gay graduate of seminary
leaves denomination to pursue ministry." This is, of course, an indictment
of our Church and denomination --- that a seminary graduate must leave our
denomination to pursue ministry.
The title and subtitle of
Eileen Flynn's article should indeed be a "wake up" call to the
Presbyterian Church (USA) and other denominations who fail to recognize that
God creates all of God's own children in the image of God including God's
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender children -- and that God does not
just call heterosexuals into ministry any more God just calls men or white
people to serve.
How many more of our own daughters and sons, and their
calls to ministry, are we willing to sacrifice by allowing prejudice and
discrimination against LGBT persons to continue in our Church?
Please join us in prayers for wisdom and courage for the
Presbyterian Church (USA) to stop the prejudice and end its discrimination
against its own LGBT daughters and sons now.
The Session of your Church can be part of ending this
prejudice and discrimination by prayerfully considering an Ordination
Overture to "delete-B" for the next General Assembly in San Jose 2008. Mike
Smith and Madeline Jervis, National MLP Board, are ready to provide
resources and assistance to you.
www.mlp.org
May God's Spirit continue to bless Karen and her family as
they begin a new journey and a new ministry.
with hope and grace,
Michael
Michael J. Adee, M.Div., Ph.D., National Field Organizer
More Light Presbyterians, 369 Montezuma Avenue # 447,
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 USA
(505) 820-7082
michaeladee@aol.com
www.mlp.org
|
| |
|
Some blogs worth visiting |
| |
|
Voices of Sophia blog
Heather Reichgott, who has created this new blog
for Voices of Sophia, introduces it:
After fifteen years of scholarship and activism,
Voices of Sophia presents a blog. Here, we present the voices of
feminist theologians of all stripes: scholars, clergy, students,
exiles, missionaries, workers, thinkers, artists, lovers and
devotees, from many parts of the world, all children of the God in
whose image women are made. .... This blog seeks to glorify God
through prayer, work, art, and intellectual reflection. Through
articles and ensuing discussion we hope to become an active and
thoughtful community. |
| |
|
Witherspoon’s Facebook page
Mitch Trigger, Witherspoon’s
Secretary/Communicator, has created a Facebook page where
Witherspoon members and others can gather to exchange news and
views. Mitch and a few others have posted bits of news, both
personal and organizational. But there’s room for more!
You can post your own news and views, or initiate
a conversation about a topic of interest to you. |
| |
|
John Harris’ Summit to Shore blogspot
Theological and philosophical reflections on
everything between summit to shore, including kayaking, climbing,
religion, spirituality, philosophy, theology, politics, culture,
travel, The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), New York City and the
Queens neighborhood of Ridgewood by a progressive New York City
Presbyterian Pastor. John is a former member of the Witherspoon
board, and is designated pastor of North Presbyterian Church in
Flushing, NY. |
| |
|
John
Shuck’s Shuck and Jive
A Presbyterian minister, currently serving as
pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Elizabethton, Tenn., blogs
about spirituality, culture, religion (both organized and
disorganized), life, evolution, literature, Jesus, and lightening
up. |
| |
|
Got more blogs to recommend?
Please
send a note, and we'll see what we can do! |
| |
|
Plan now for our 2010 Ghost Ranch
Seminar!
GHOST RANCH SEMINAR
July 26-August 1, 2010
WE’RE
ALL IN THIS TOGETHER
CONFRONTING THE STRUCTURES OF INJUSTICE |
| |
|
If you like what you find
here,
we hope you'll help us keep this website going ... and growing!
Please consider making a special
contribution -- large or small -- to help us continue and improve
this service.
Click here to send a gift online, using your credit card,
through PayPal.
Or send your check, made
out to "Witherspoon Society" and marked "web site," to our
Witherspoon Bookkeeper:
Susan Robertson
9650 Clover Circle
Eden Prairie, MN 55347 |
| |
|