Jewish Voice for
Peace Statement on Divestment as a Strategy to End Israel's
Occupation
|
Another Israel-based group,
New Profile, has
issued a statement in favor of divestment. |
[12-14-04]
A statement from Jewish Voice for
Peace
With some 10,000
members and supporters, and a board of advisors that includes
high-profile American Jews and Israeli peace activists,
Jewish Voice for Peace
is
one of the largest and oldest grassroots Jewish peace organizations in
the United States.
For years, through its call to suspend military aid to Israel until it
ends its occupation of Palestinian lands, Jewish Voice for Peace has led
the call for material pressure on Israel. Now, other prominent groups
have joined in the effort to resist funding the occupation, while
maintaining a positive relationship with the Israeli people.
In July, 2004, the Presbyterian Church made a decision to investigate
selective divestment from companies that profit from Israel's
occupation. As a result, a number of mainline Jewish organizations have
called on Christian organizations to oppose divestment. All the while,
the actual content of the Presbyterian Church's decision has been
misreported as a decision to divest from Israel. In fact, the PCUSA
merely decided to investigate divestment from companies, both American
and Israeli, that profit from the occupation.
At JVP, we fully support selective divestment from companies that profit
from Israel's occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem.
This includes American companies like Caterpillar who profit from the
wholesale destruction of Palestinian homes and orchards. It also
includes Israeli companies who depend on settlements for materials or
labor or who produce military equipment used to violate Palestinian
human rights.
We believe that general divestment from Israel is an unwise strategy at
this time. We believe that economic measures targeted specifically at
the occupation and the Israeli military complex that sustains it are
much more likely to produce results.
However, we absolutely reject the accusation that general divestment or
boycott campaigns are inherently anti-Semitic. The Israeli government is
a government like any other, and condemning its abuse of state power, as
many of its own citizens do quite vigorously, is in no way the same as
attacking the Jewish people.
Further, it is crucial not only to criticize the immoral and illegal
acts of the Israeli government, but to back up that criticism with
action. Socially responsible investing, divestment, and boycott
campaigns have proven to be effective tools for both individuals and
institutions working to make governments accountable to international
human rights standards. The mere fact that some groups have chosen
different or more aggressive tactics from us does not necessarily make
them anti-Semitic.
Each year, US corporations receive an alarming subsidy from US
taxpayers, primarily in the form of US military aid to Israel. The total
amount of US aid given to Israel since 1949 represents the largest
transfer of funds from one country to another in history. Seventy-five
percent of US military aid to Israel must by law be spent in US
corporations, making corporations, not Israel or Israelis, the primary
recipients of US aid. This means that US corporations are primary
beneficiaries of Israel's continued and brutal military occupation of
Palestinian lands.
The lopsided American foreign policy may seem to be in Israel's
interest, but it actually works to the detriment of the Israeli people.
Continued militarization of Israeli society increases the exposure of
Israeli women and children to violence in their daily lives, and has
helped lead the country to economic crisis. At the same time, this
unbalanced US foreign policy has devastated the Palestinians. Americans
of conscience must work to balance that policy in favor of a peaceful
solution. It is not discriminatory that Americans working for a just
peace focus their attention on Israel's occupation and take concrete
steps to end it, like divesting from companies profiting from Israel's
occupation.
Neither the US nor Israel will change their policies in favor of peace
through their own goodwill. This is not the way of governments. Tangible
pressure must be brought to bear if policies promoting a better future
are to take root. The time has come for groups to bring that pressure to
bear.
We salute the Presbyterian Church for their courage in taking on this
critical human rights issue, and are grateful for the visionary
leadership of the Sisters of Loretto and the Sisters of Mercy who
insisted on holding the Caterpillar Corporation to account for their
sale of weaponized bulldozers to Israel.
And we remind the many groups that are alarmed by the Presbyterian
Church's actions that the best way to stop the growing divestment
movement is to eliminate its root cause -- Israel's illegal occupation
of Palestinian land.
We call on all Americans of conscience to join the Presbyterian Church,
the Sisters of Loretto, Sisters of Mercy, and Jewish Voice for Peace in
taking tangible steps to create a better future for Israelis and
Palestinians together.
#
# # #
Recent news stories about JVP and this issue:
From churches, a
challenge to Israeli policies,
Christian
Science Monitor
Rights Group Targets Bulldozer Company,
The Forward
Divestment Debate Continues with Resolution
Against Caterpillar Inc., The Christian Post
US Churches Take
Stand Against Israeli Occupation,
Arab News